ABSTRACT
Abstract Background and objectives One of the disadvantages of unilateral spinal anesthesia is the short duration of post-operative analgesia, which can be addressed by adding adjuvants to local anesthetics. The aim of current study was to compare the effects of adding dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, or saline to bupivacaine on the properties of unilateral spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing calf surgery. Methods In this double-blind clinical trial, 90 patients who underwent elective calf surgery were randomly divided into three groups. The spinal anesthetic rate in each of the three groups was 1 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (5 mg). In groups BD, BF and BS, 5 µg of dexmedetomidine, 25 µg of fentanyl and 0.5 mL saline were added, respectively. The duration of the motor and sensory blocks in both limbs and the rate of pain during 24 h after surgery were calculated. Hemodynamic changes were also measured during anesthesia for up to 90 min. Results The duration of both of motor and sensory block was significantly longer in dependent limb in the BF (96 and 169 min) and BD (92 and 166 min) groups than the BS (84 and 157 min) group. Visual Analog Scale was significantly lower in the two groups of BF (1.4) and BD (1.3), within 24 h after surgery, than the BS (1.6) group. Conclusions The addition of fentanyl and dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in unilateral spinal anesthesia can increase the duration of the motor and sensory block in dependent limb and prolong the duration of postoperative pain. However, fentanyl is more effective than dexmedetomidine.
Resumo Justificativa e objetivos Uma das desvantagens da raquianestesia unilateral é a curta duração da analgesia pós-operatória, que pode ser abordada pela adição de adjuvantes aos anestésicos locais. O objetivo deste estudo foi comparar os efeitos da adição de dexmedetomidina, fentanil ou solução salina à bupivacaína sobre as propriedades da raquianestesia unilateral em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de panturrilha. Métodos Neste ensaio clínico duplo-cego, 90 pacientes submetidos à cirurgia eletiva de panturrilha foram randomicamente divididos em três grupos. A quantidade de anestésico para a raquianestesia nos três grupos foi de 1 mL de bupivacaína a 0,5% (5 mg). Nos grupos BD, BF e BS, 5 µg de dexmedetomidina, 25 µg de fentanil e 0,5 mL de solução salina foram adicionados, respectivamente. Foram calculados a duração dos bloqueios motor e sensorial em ambos os membros e o escore de dor durante 24 horas após a cirurgia. As alterações hemodinâmicas também foram medidas durante a anestesia por até 90 minutos. Resultados A duração de ambos os bloqueios, motor e sensorial, foi significativamente maior no membro dependente nos grupos BF (96 e 169 min) e BD (92 e 166 min) do que no grupo BS (84 e 157 min). Os escores da escala visual analógica foram significativamente menores nos grupos BF (1,4) e BD (1,3) do que no grupo BS (1,6) nas 24 horas após a cirurgia. Conclusões A adição de fentanil e dexmedetomidina à bupivacaína em raquianestesia unilateral pode aumentar a duração dos bloqueios sensorial e motor no membro dependente e prolongar a duração da dor pós-operatória. Contudo, fentanil é mais eficaz do que dexmedetomidina.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Young Adult , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Lower Extremity/surgery , Adjuvants, Anesthesia/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Middle AgedABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: la anestesia espinal unilateral (AEU) es una alternativa para el desarrollo de la cirugía ortopédica ambulatoria (COA). el OBJETIVO de este ensayo clínico fue el evaluar una dosis baja de bupivacaína hiperbara (BHB), asociada a fentanilo intratecal (FI) para obtención de AEU en COA. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: ensayo clínico, prospectivo, controlado en pacientes ASA I a II. la AEU se efectuó con el paciente en decúbito lateral (DL), con el lado operatorio hacia abajo, a nivel de L3-L4. se inyectó 5 mg de BHB 0,75% asociado a 20 µg de FI. se evaluó el bloqueo sensitivo (BS) y motor (BM) cada 3 minutos, los primeros 20 minutos y luego cada 15 minutos. Se midió el nivel máximo alcanzado, el tiempo de regresión a T12 y el tiempo de regresión de dos segmentos. se registró la incidencia de complicaciones. RESULTADOS: 50 pacientes fueron incluidos, 66% de sexo masculino. Se obtuvo anestesia unilateral en el 84% y BM total unilateral en el 86%. La altura del BS osciló entre T9 y T11. la duración del BS fue 116 min. (SD± 23). la regresión a T12 fue de 47 min (SD±19). No se encontró correlación entre talla, dosis y duración de bloqueo. ningún paciente necesitó anestesia general. 1 paciente presentó bradicardia. DISCUSIÓN: la AEU con dosis bajas de BHB asociado a FI es eficiente en COA. se obtuvo adecuados BS y BM en la mayoría de los pacientes. la AEU mostró ser confiable, permitiendo una alta precoz y segura.
INTRODUCTION: The unilateral spinal anesthesia (USA) is an alternative for orthopedic ambulatory surgery (OAS). The AIM of this study was to evaluate a low dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine (HB) associated with intrathecal fentanyl (ITF) to produce USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, controlled clinical trial in ASA I II patients. The USA was developed in lateral position with the operating side downwards between L3-L4 space with 5 mg of HB + 20 µg ITF. We evaluated sensitive level block (SB), motor level block (MB), maximum level obtained, discharge time (DT) and collateral effects incidence. RESULTS: 50 patients were included, 66% male. The USA was obtained in 84% and total BM was present in 86% of cases. The level obtained of SB was between T9-T11 and the duration was 116 min (SD± 23). No correlation was obtained between patients height, BH dose and block duration. 1 patient presented bradycardia. No general anesthesia was necessary. DISCUSSION: The USA with a low dose of HB and ITF it's safe to developed OAS. Only 11 min were necessary to obtain a good SB and MB.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Bupivacaine/administration & dosage , Orthopedic Procedures/methods , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/methods , Anesthesia, Spinal/methods , Fentanyl/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Anesthesia, LocalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Unilateral spinal anesthesia prolongs sensory blockade and provides hemodynamic stability. Intrathecal opioids enhance spinal anesthesia without prolonging motor recovery or hemodynamic side effects. The author evaluated the effect of intrathecal fentanyl on unilateral spinal blockade with hyperbaric bupivacaine for knee arthroscopy. METHODS: Thirty-six healthy patients undergoing unilateral knee arthroscopy randomly received unilateral spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 4 mg (Group I) or 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 4 mg combined with fentanyl 10 microgram (Group II). A lateral decubitus position was maintained for 15 minutes after intrathecal injection. The level and duration of sensory and motor blockade were recorded. RESULTS: The regression time of sensory block by two segments on dependent site was prolonged on Group II more than Group I (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between two groups in recovery time of sensory and motor block. Unilateral sensory block was observed in 18 patients in Group I (100%) and in 2 patients in Group II (11%). Hemodynamic side effects were minimal in both groups, but pruritus was observed in 6 patients in Group II (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Small dose of intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine unilateral spinal anesthesia prolonged the duration of sensory block on operated site, but did not increase side effects and the duration of motor block and recovery. But intrathecal fentanyl with bupivacaine made disturbance of successful unilateral spinal block by the sensory block of nonoperated site.
Subject(s)
Humans , Analgesics, Opioid , Anesthesia, Spinal , Arthroscopy , Bupivacaine , Fentanyl , Hemodynamics , Injections, Spinal , Knee , PruritusABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Levobupivacaine is the isolated S-enantiomer of bupivacaine and may be a favorable alternative to bupivacaine. The author evaluated the clinical efficacy of levobupivacaine relative to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia. METHODS: The author randomly allocated 40 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing lower limb surgery to do unilateral spinal anesthesia with 8% glucose bupivacaine 4 mg (n = 20) or 8% glucose levobupivacaine 4 mg (n = 20). Spinal anesthesia was performed at the L3-4 interspace using a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle. The lateral decubitus position was maintained for fifteen minutes after injection. RESULTS: Thirty minutes after injection, unilateral sensory block was present in 60% and 40% of cases, and unilateral motor block was observed in 90% and 85% in levobupivacaine and bupivacaine group, respectively. Levobupivacaine group had no differences as compared to bupivacaine group for spinal block resolution. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that 8% glucose levobupivacaine 4 mg and 8% glucose bupivacaine 4 mg provided similar spinal block for lower limb surgery without hemodynamic unstability.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia, Spinal , Bupivacaine , Glucose , Hemodynamics , Lower Extremity , NeedlesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The relationship between the injection speed of a local anesthetic and the success rate of unilateral spinal anesthesia has been a controversial issue. The aim of this thesis was to identify any significant effects of the drug injection speed on the success rate of unilateral spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Forty patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups, group R and S. The injection speed was 4 ml/min in group R (n = 20) and 1 ml/min in group S (n = 20). Hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine 10 mg was injected via a syringe pump. The drug was administered at the L3-4 intervertebral space with the patient in the lateral decubitus position, which was maintained for 20 minutes after the injection. A spinal sensory block was assessed by examining the temperature sensation using an alcohol-sponge. The motor block was evaluated using the modified Bromage scale and the dependent and non-dependent sides were compared. RESULTS: Significant differences (P<0.05) were observed in the success rate of unilateral motor paralysis (45% in group R vs 90% in group S). There were no significant blood pressure differences between the two groups 5, 10, 15, 30 and 60 minutes after injecting the hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine. CONCLUSIONS: The injection speed of local anesthetics is one of the crucial factors for achieving a unilateral spinal anesthesia. Therefore, it is important to maintain a slow injection speed of a local anesthetic in unilateral spinal anesthesia.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia, Spinal , Anesthetics, Local , Blood Pressure , Bupivacaine , Paralysis , Sensation , SyringesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: When attempting a unilateral spinal anesthesia, many factors must be considered including patient's position, density and amount of the local anesthetics, needle design, injection speed. We evaluated a duration of lateral decubitus with low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine for maximizing the benefit. METHODS: Hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine 6 mg was administered slowly through a 25-gauge Whitacre needle to 60 ASA 1-2 patients undergoing unilateral lower extremity surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to four groups based on the duration of lateral decubitus after spinal anesthesia: 5 minutes in Group I; 10 minutes in Group II; 15 minutes in Group III; 20 minutes in Group IV. Circulatory variables, sensory and motor block level were recorded. RESULTS: The circulatory variables were stable in all patients. In the Group I, the success rate of unilateral motor block was significantly lower than other groups. In the Group IV, the success rate of unilateral sensory block was significantly higher than group I. In the Group II, III, IV, the patient's satisfaction scores were significantly higher than Group I. CONCLUSIONS: When unilateral spinal anesthesia was attempted with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 6 mg, cardiovascular stability was achieved in the groups that patients are kept in a lateral decubitus for more than 5 minutes after spinal injection, and patient's higher satisfaction scores were achieved in the unilateral motor block and in the groups that patients are kept in a lateral decubitus for more than 15 minutes after spinal injection.
Subject(s)
Humans , Anesthesia , Anesthesia, Spinal , Anesthetics, Local , Bupivacaine , Injections, Spinal , Lower Extremity , NeedlesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia potentiates sedative drug effects. We speculated that an acute decrease in tonic afferent input by spinal anesthesia would decrease the level of consciousness and thereby increase susceptibility to sedative drugs. The experiments were approached with the assumption that the amount of sedative would reduce in the following order: first, the group without spinal anesthesia, second, the group with unilateral spinal anesthesia, and third, the group with conventional spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Patients in group 1 (n = 20) were given midazolam without spinal anesthesia and patients in group 2 (n = 20) received unilateral spinal anesthesia. Those patients who after 20 minutes had a sensory level of T9-11 and a motor block of 3 in dependent side, no sensory block, and a motor block of 0 in the non-dependent side were included. In group 3 (n = 20), patients received conventional spinal anesthesia, and those patients who after 20 minutes had a sensory level of T9-11 and a motor block of 3 were included. The amount of midazolam administered at 33microgram/kg/min to a Bispectral Index score (BIS) of 80 was measured. RESULTS: The dose of midazolam administered to a BIS of 80 was significantly lower in group 3 than in group 1 or group 2. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of sedatives was in the following order: the group with conventional spinal anesthesia, the group with unilateral spinal anesthesia, and the group not administered spinal anesthesia.